Behind Every Great Woman, There's a Great Man
Doggystyle is the sexual representation of the power struggle between man and woman in their relationship. Every woman wants an aggressive man, that can subdue or calm her. Doggystyle is the infatuation of the man for his thick woman and the animalistic tendencies which he and she harbor within.
Can you subdue your woman?
Can you make her submit to you in pleasure?
Can you dominate the situation?
Are you inherently a man?
Sometimes you have to show your woman what time it is and I ain't talking Rolex. You have to show her that you're a man and you wear the pants around this place. She might get it confused, leaving the toilet seat up isn't always enough to convince her at times that you are the man. Sure black girls rock, but sometimes you have to rock the socks off that black girl.
Tonight, make sure there's no confusion in your home and tell your old lady to "bend over". Good hunting fellas...
Ladies: Is doggystyle your favorite position and why? Do you like your men to take charge? Do you need a mix of aggression and affection from your man?
Labels: #blackgirlsrock, behind, dogg, doggystyle, lions, Long, man woman black relationships, Nia, sex, snoop
posted by theSUNK at
10:08 PM
7 Comments:
that is a very sexist comment that you're telling men they should show their women "whose wearing the pants" and that doggy style is about domination. First of all, no relationship should ever be about power, it should be about trust and compromises, among other things. Second, doggystyle is pleasing to women because it enables her man to go deep, deeper than they coul in any other position, while the woman can also still please herself in this position. Any man that finds pleasure in doggystyle because they feel their woman is being submissive to them and that they're dominating them is a man that does not respect women at all.
Dont I love comments. Well you believe relationship aren't power struggles, that is cute. Compromises are agreements between to conflicting parties/people, and conflicts are inherently POWER struggles. Yes, relationships are about trust, but there is a head to all relationships(men and women switch the roles of sub/dom throughout the relationship) I never said that women couldn't be a head of a relationship, I just merely stated that the physical representation of doggystyle was similar to the emotinal tug-of-war of a relationship. For the most part, relatonships are generally equal, but a power struggle exist between man and woman, just because of the way we experience and express things to one another.
I don't belive submissive is a bad thing. Sometimes I even have to submit in order to pursue the greater good between myself and a partner. Sometimes its better to backdown for the overall benefit of the group(dyad).
Secondly, I know all to well about how deep a man can go from doggystyle and why it pleases a woman. But it is also pleasing for women to have their man take charge of the relationship. I wouldn't say all, but most women like men to take charge; this isn't sexist at all(that's why we have the cowgirl position, lol).
I'm not advocating men being dominate over their women, I respect all women. But I will not disregard the fact that if a man is handling his business the woman is willingly submissive(or passive).
Ex. "Parents are the dominate, but they are passive to their childrens wants and desires sometimes, when the children have met said requirements of the parents"
Or maybe you just have a problem with the word "submissive". Many people take notice to all the weak associations with the word rather than acknowledging the stronger denotative qualites of "submissive" which is compliant, DEFERENT, or agreeable.
Thanks for the comment. But in actuality, this was just a fun post for laughs it was being sort of satirical. That is why it was so short. Thanks, again for the comment.
But, you see you just gave an example of parents vs. children. Are you seriously comparing a relationship between man and woman to that of a parent and child? Historically women have been treated as children by men, so I can't help but to be offended by that. Also, the title of this is offensive to women, as if saying there would be no great women without great men.
And, I can't speak for all women, but I think what most women like is a man who pays attention to them, such as calling often and asking them out, not "take charge" or "dominate". In addition, to be "inherently a man", like you said in the article, does not have anything to do with what sexual positions you partake in with your woman, and especially has nothing to do with whether a man dominates.
I LOVE doggystle, and found the picture very interesting, but not because I think my man is taking charge. I find your blog very interesting and sometimes useful.
I liked it that you wrote an article about this position, and I'm not trying to tear apart everything you said, but I think you should be more aware of your words, and the people you are influencing. We have enough men walking all over women and treating them as children as it is. I bet you can think of something better to say about sex, women, and men. Like the one about fuck buddies :)
I agree with you and some of your points. I never said men want to dominate women, I said women want men that can "subdue and calm them." Men that are able to take the reins of a situation. Men aren't dominant, because we're control freaks or thats all we seek, but because women submit this power to us. Like I said, if a man is taking care of business, a woman will willingly oblige to his request or his lead. Part of being a man is being the leader of a household, and most likely the bedroom as well. If a man is trying to be dominate but he's incompetent, than get in his azz. But if he's a good man, than baby bend over and let him go as deep as he can.
Dominance is a reward. WE give the president power to reign over the country because we believe he is a strong leader of our American houshold. Just like a woman, will nominate her man as the leader of the relationship and household, if he is competent.
And I named the post becuase of the ever-so-famous saying "Behind Every Great Man, There's a Great Woman" It is my rebuttal. I believe we need one another. But many women dnt want to say they need men, because they dont want to seem weak or submissive. But I never knew needed the one you love was a weak trait. Silly me.
Thanks again, and stop being anonymous, I like your thought provoking comments. U can guest post if you would like to make a rebuttal.
Yes, many women are submissive to men, but it is not necessarily because they want to, they just don't know what else to do. Right now we are living in a man's world where society teaches us to be submissive to men. To promote this type of behavior would be to demote women's progress toward equality in society and in politics. I don't want a man to lead a household for me, nor do any of my friends! I just want someone who is willing to split responsibilities with me half and half!
I understand that for the most part this piece was supposed to be funny and light hearted, but its causual stuff like this that can really get into people's heads. You seem like a man who loves women, and I don't think you'd do something like that intentionally.
And BTW, I don't have an account with any of these profiles or whatever that you can comment by. And maybe I'm just not blog-savvy so anonymous was the only way I could figure out to comment lol. This is Lindsey! :)
First off I am very sad that I did not run into this page earlier. You provide some very thought provoking and interesting topics that need to be discussed.
I am in the military and I support you argument with this analogy.
On the battle field you have Frontline soldiers which do majority of all the fighting and dying. Also on the battlefield you have the Rearline soldiers which do majority of all the logistics and supporting. What most people don’t realize is that no matter you task no soldier is greater than the other. Just because the Frontline soldiers do most of the receives most of the glory due to the dangers they face, this does not make them more important that the Rearline solider. IF THE FRONTLINE SOLDIERS RUN OUT OF BULLETS WHAT WOULD THEY DO WITHOUT THE REALINE SOLDIERS? They would be unable to fight or effectively preform their tasks. This is why one duty is not more important than another.
I hope you are following so far…….
No there is a direct power struggle between these two soldiers because they both want to receive equal amount of attention, glory, and respect. But due to outside factors and beliefs they will always have a internal struggles.
Relationships are very much a struggle of power between a man and a woman because both these individuals want the mutual respect they deserve. But without each other neither would exist. I believe a women naturally wants to fulfill the support roll and men the attack (not to say that they cannot be switched). But without some kind of submission and some kind leadership then nothing great can be accomplished.
This all applies to doggie style because without a women being able to submit and a man being able to lead then we can never accomplish one the great pleasure of life…….. Deep Organisms …..LOL!!
@Rickey, Thanks for the profound response to my post. I hope you enjoy many more topics bruh. It's refreshing to hear a well thought out comment. Come again, give me suggestions abt what I should write, and Like the thesunk fb page, too.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home